nice professional type discussion,
but what 's it going to do ?
I think there are two types:
communist and entraprenure
both are politically chained
one from within the other is surrounded by skeptics.
power of influence is the vehicle for ideas.
“ganster rap” had enough influence to distroy mc hammers record sales
when he fabricated a hard image.
the consumers punished him for being out of touch
corporate senses produce culture fabrications in the same way.
large chunks of cash make it do-able.
can you blame the sharehoders, ceo, sales, design, or the buerocracy effect of an over communicated system?
why is this buisness having so much difficulty defining proper communication techniques?
especially when thats how clients are told to percieve design value.
its one thing to educate a client, but what happens when design shows up in its range of varieties from within the process which then in turn identifies how intent and quality degrades with the mis-use of heirarchial tactical tequniques. i.e. : tv shows on discovery channel
in the end result, after the shareholders have sold the stock and the performance is where the value sits how can you say where the responseability reflects light.
dose it matter as a designer?
the deisign value is about what it is, what it is supposed to be
what effect it has, the percieved value vs. its true performance and the absolute value of that performance.
if, it depends what your position is, then how and where is it ethicall to use competiton as a scenario for success.
I’m Rick James bitch!