Close

Lytro Camera

Postby ineo » October 19th, 2011, 8:59 pm

User avatar

ineo
step three
step three
 
Posts: 132
Joined: August 23rd, 2008, 3:52 pm
Location: University of Cincinnati, DAAP
Check this out: http://www.lytro.com/

It takes pictures that allow you to focus after the picture was taken. It also adds a sense of dimensionality to photos- so that you can move the subject around a little bit, giving off the effect of a change in perspective... It's pretty wild tech, not to mention the beautiful hardware.

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby NURB » October 19th, 2011, 9:29 pm

User avatar

NURB
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4691
Joined: November 10th, 2005, 1:31 pm
Location: MPLS
Hands on here:
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/10/19/hands-on-with-the-new-lytro-camera/

Prototype review with interactive photo:
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/10/13/lytro-beta-testers-calling-the-camera-a-game-changer/#more-38295

Amazing tech. I wish they'd done something a bit more traditional with the body, but considering the paradigm shift this thing could be, it's appropriate.
Chris Haar

twitter:@chrishaar

Those who define design as knowing how to use Illustrator will be condemned to using Illustrator their entire career. - @monteiro

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby iamdavidhill » October 20th, 2011, 6:31 am

User avatar

iamdavidhill
step two
step two
 
Posts: 58
Joined: June 10th, 2011, 3:19 pm
Location: UK.
Wow, I want one! Both the software and the hardware look amazing.

I love the shape and design of the body, I love that it's not a traditional body although my bet is tha the technology will obviously be introduced and licensed so that it can be incorperated into tradional bodies.

Simply awesome. A definite game changer.

###
DAVID HILL | PRODUCT DESIGNER, UK.
Product Design Portfolio | www.productdesignportfolio.com

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby Brett_nyc » October 20th, 2011, 9:22 am


Brett_nyc
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 875
Joined: May 30th, 2006, 9:57 am
This seems really cool. I played with some of the demos on their site, and I think it just needs more resolution.

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby bcpid » October 20th, 2011, 12:06 pm


bcpid
step four
step four
 
Posts: 389
Joined: March 20th, 2004, 8:26 pm
I have always wanted this. Coolest thing I've seen in ages.

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby scrotum » October 27th, 2011, 2:48 pm

User avatar

scrotum
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 616
Joined: July 23rd, 2010, 4:09 pm
Location: Hiking the Appalachian Trail
Lytro camera: 5 things to know before you buy

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-201 ... picStories

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby Hoodzy » October 27th, 2011, 9:25 pm


Hoodzy
step three
step three
 
Posts: 188
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 1:51 pm
Location: Canada
So let me get this straight. You can only change the focus after you have converted the photo into a 1080x1080 photo?? (USELESS)

Until I've used one personally I don't think I am a fan. Looks annoying to use.

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby NURB » October 27th, 2011, 9:53 pm

User avatar

NURB
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4691
Joined: November 10th, 2005, 1:31 pm
Location: MPLS
Yeah, so they got me with the tech, but dropped the ball on the delivery. Such a bummer. If they'd made the pricepoint 2-3 hundred dollars more, and added a bit more to the system as a whole they'd really have been on to something.

Now it's nothing but gimmicks.
Chris Haar

twitter:@chrishaar

Those who define design as knowing how to use Illustrator will be condemned to using Illustrator their entire career. - @monteiro

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby nicanor » October 27th, 2011, 10:30 pm


nicanor
step four
step four
 
Posts: 291
Joined: April 30th, 2009, 1:33 am
Location: Vancouver, BC Canada
It's new tech, it'll eventually improve but I guess for now they have to start getting some income for the R&D spent. It's marketed more for interactive internet photos vs DSLR crowd, hence they don't use megapixel and similar jargon. I remember Adobe making a similar idea with a lens with a bunch of individual lens on it. Was about 3 years ago or so when I last heard of it. Had to dig for it but here it is:
http://www.geekologie.com/2008/02/adobe ... rdware.php

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby joyride » October 28th, 2011, 7:28 am


joyride
step four
step four
 
Posts: 293
Joined: October 21st, 2008, 3:51 pm
I was wondering about the output of it. What a bummer. I cant do much with a 1080x 1080 image. That lightfield 'image' must be packed with information on it. Each image would be roughly 23 megs (8000megs/300 images). Seems like a lot of hassle for no real output.

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby engio » October 28th, 2011, 8:49 am


engio
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 816
Joined: October 3rd, 2007, 3:04 pm
Has the exposure time been mentioned anywhere?

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby sonofscrotum » January 8th, 2016, 12:39 am


sonofscrotum
step four
step four
 
Posts: 213
Joined: March 11th, 2015, 2:48 pm
Location: Hiking the Appalachian Trail
This thing turned out to be a major flop, can't even find it at the stores anymore. It really looked promising back when it was first introduced.

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby louis leblanc » January 10th, 2016, 10:49 am

User avatar

louis leblanc
step three
step three
 
Posts: 160
Joined: June 13th, 2010, 1:32 pm
sonofscrotum wrote:This thing turned out to be a major flop, can't even find it at the stores anymore. It really looked promising back when it was first introduced.


I think they got the business model wrong. It's really cool cutting edge technology. Get pictures with the information on the direction of the light. I think going after the general consumer market wasn't the right choice. Especially since the big push was towards their live pictures that would allow you, in a web browser to to move the focus point in the image. It was all really a gimmick... not to mention couldn't be shared well on social media.

I think they were afraid of going up against the standard camera market as they knew they wouldn't be able to get the image quality. Maybe that could have made it for video - pulling focus in video is a true headache.

With that said, they seem to be pulling away from the consumer market and have found a use for the technology in VR. https://www.lytro.com/

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby sonofscrotum » March 21st, 2018, 12:39 pm


sonofscrotum
step four
step four
 
Posts: 213
Joined: March 11th, 2015, 2:48 pm
Location: Hiking the Appalachian Trail
So after raising $200 million the company gets bought by Google for a fraction of that.

https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/20/sourc ... about-40m/

Re: Lytro Camera

Postby Cyberdemon » March 21st, 2018, 1:47 pm

User avatar

Cyberdemon
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 3375
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 11:51 pm
Location: New York
sonofscrotum wrote:So after raising $200 million the company gets bought by Google for a fraction of that.

https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/20/sourc ... about-40m/


They're probably right in their assessment that Google would rather have the IP and some key employees and thats about it. Your valuation doesn't mean much when the business has failed, I actually didn't even realize they were still around.

Go to the Next Page

Return to general design discussion