I'm just gonna go ahead and assume you are a massive troll with no life, but in the spirit of entertainment I present you the following retort.
jamesking wrote:I am curious why a "suck ergonomically" work was awarded IF ? You mean IF has a bad sense in judgement? I am willing to see how your works are not ergonomics suck!
You are curious. Why did IF award the other design? I'm not sure, why don't you contact the judges and I dunno, ask them? We've provided you with our professional (not student) opinions and advice, FOR FREE.
jamesking wrote:Or maybe your works are all suck so that you think all other kinds of works suck!
You got me Dr.Phil, it's true, I do it all just to wrack up my post count on Core77 by telling everyone here that their work is trash, I actually have a degree in debate, I don't know anything about design. Are you in the bridge market by chance?
jamesking wrote:You applied by yourself or agency? it is useless for you to understand patent if you apply through agency.You can know nothing but some basic knowledge from them. I can not believe you are professional on patent but mentioned a obviously amateurish issue. You know why? Every inventor hope to widlely protect his/her invention so that he/she must try to avoid some finite words, such as numbers, materials and colors if it is not necessary. The reason is that, like the keyboard, the patent can be easily pirated if you define one camera when others use two or three cameras. If I define the transparent material with glass, you may use transparent plastic or other kind of transparent materials.Therefore the patent is meanless. So, it is impossible for a professional to focus on one or two cameras. On the other hand , how do u know that there is only one camera in my design? Only through the picture ? It is only a design, not the real solution. In fact, two cameras located at one point towards two dirrections is a possible solution when it is produced.
I'll tell you a story about Jack McGory and now my story's begun, I'll tell you another about his brother, and now my story is done.
jamesking wrote:Are you confident with your experience and judgement?
I thought I was until I read your posts, now I realize I have a lot of work to do in the confidence department.
jamesking wrote:About prototype, I think it a useless issue though you always ask. Not all the patents need prototype. I never built one for my patents.
Agreed, why waste time prototyping a weak concept when you can just persuade stupid investors, chah!
jamesking wrote:I feel nothing in fact and it is common.
No, no it's not, unless you are a robot, you aren't a robot are you? If so then your concept is awesome and I have no idea about the whereabouts of Sarah Connor, and no you may not have my clothes, boots, or motorcycle.
jamesking wrote:Don't worry. the post is not about stage.
This is where I disagree, this has become quite a bit of theater.
jamesking wrote:Please read the post carefully. You may understand it when you read it thousands of times if it is hard to understand.
Nope, can you try to explain it differently? I don't think we're getting it.
jamesking wrote: Can you declare that it is your design if you copy a Beatles car and just because the design has been in public?
For the record, I am unaware of the Beatles ever having a car...a yellow submarine maybe. But would that be public? I suppose if it was sighted in international waters, but then, it would be under water....good question.
jamesking wrote:P.S. I never said someone is attacking me. And it is normal if someone does.
So it is normal to be attacked? No, no it's not, that's the point, you came on here acting like a whiny arrogant douchebag, it has nothing to do with your concepts, your design talent, or your patent knowledge, you need to work on how you interact with others and solicit professional opinions or you will never find and hold a job nor will any of your ideas, deigns or inventions go to market if you treat investors as "stupid". I'm glad you came here seeking professional help, but we are NOT the type of professionals that can actually help you.
jamesking wrote:After all it is not acceptable for someone to admit pirating. I can understand you.
Then why did you bother asking us?
jamesking wrote:Sorry for my frankly speaking, there is no relationship between the patent you posted and my design at all therefore I ask you to learn some patent knowledge, which may hurt you and someones else. They are obviously different technologies even if you know some simple technology( this also sharp words...)
Nobody cares anymore. Read that 1000 times.
jamesking wrote:I may open a patent class for someones who can not exactly distinguish different ones in the future. Would you like to join ? ?
Yes, but only if you agree to join my Advanced Western Online Forum Etiquette Class.