Close

Which monitor should I get?

Postby sachin » November 21st, 2016, 7:32 pm

User avatar

sachin
step three
step three
 
Posts: 163
Joined: October 8th, 2008, 12:23 pm
Location: Austin, TX
I'm would like to get a monitor thats larger than 27" and would work with Mac and PC. Any good suggestions?

Re: Which monitor should I get?

Postby slippyfish » November 22nd, 2016, 1:44 pm

User avatar

slippyfish
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 1459
Joined: January 5th, 2004, 7:07 pm
Location: 48 degrees north
I bought an LG 34" Ultrawide for home use (mostly Macbook Pro), as it was a slightly better deal at the time than an Apple screen. Since then we've bought three more for the ID team, and a sprinkling of engineers around the company got them too. Works well with Mac and PC; heck you can even plug both computers in at once and split the screen. Color calibration is a bit finicky but I don't obsess about that stuff too much.
“Traveling through hyperspace isn't like dusting crops, boy."

http://www.superformer.com
http://www.coroflot.com/skhid

Re: Which monitor should I get?

Postby Cyberdemon » November 22nd, 2016, 2:54 pm

User avatar

Cyberdemon
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 11:51 pm
Location: New York
Ditto - I've switched to the LG 34" both at home and at work. I use the 34UM95 at home and the 34UM88 at work. Both are thunderbolt monitors so I can connect my Macbook with just a single cable. At home it lets me easily switch between my PC tower to my Macbook just by changing inputs.

It occasionally is finicky with changing inputs, but the color calibration is extremely good out of the box (I calibrated my 95 with a Spyder and it was 95% of the way there)

If you want a display for both platforms IMO it's the way to go. Great for gaming and movies as well.

Re: Which monitor should I get?

Postby MK19 » November 23rd, 2016, 12:24 pm


MK19
step three
step three
 
Posts: 108
Joined: August 19th, 2016, 10:13 am
Isn't 34 inch 21:9 very small on the vertical space? I use a 32 inch 16:9 monitor but would happily use a 30 inch 16:10 also.

Re: Which monitor should I get?

Postby Cyberdemon » November 23rd, 2016, 12:35 pm

User avatar

Cyberdemon
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 11:51 pm
Location: New York
MK19 wrote:Isn't 34 inch 21:9 very small on the vertical space? I use a 32 inch 16:9 monitor but would happily use a 30 inch 16:10 also.


It's identical in height to a 27" 16:9 1440P display, but with an extra ~8" of width tacked on to the sides. So if you were a former user of a 27" Thunderbolt display, it's an easy upgrade.

If you are PC only, then 30" 4K displays have their advantages, especially if pixel count is more important. I had a Dell 16:10 30" for a short period of time and found the extra vertical height to be too much for how close I was sitting. The 27" Dell was a nicer blend of PPI to screen real estate and the 34" just added some more room for additional windows and tool bars off to the side so I could go from being a dual monitor user to single monitor user without too much of a hurdle and eliminating the bezel in the middle of my screen.

Re: Which monitor should I get?

Postby MK19 » November 23rd, 2016, 5:25 pm


MK19
step three
step three
 
Posts: 108
Joined: August 19th, 2016, 10:13 am
Cyberdemon wrote:
MK19 wrote:Isn't 34 inch 21:9 very small on the vertical space? I use a 32 inch 16:9 monitor but would happily use a 30 inch 16:10 also.


It's identical in height to a 27" 16:9 1440P display, but with an extra ~8" of width tacked on to the sides. So if you were a former user of a 27" Thunderbolt display, it's an easy upgrade.

If you are PC only, then 30" 4K displays have their advantages, especially if pixel count is more important. I had a Dell 16:10 30" for a short period of time and found the extra vertical height to be too much for how close I was sitting. The 27" Dell was a nicer blend of PPI to screen real estate and the 34" just added some more room for additional windows and tool bars off to the side so I could go from being a dual monitor user to single monitor user without too much of a hurdle and eliminating the bezel in the middle of my screen.

Maybe I'm lazy but I feel like I'd have to turn my head too much for a 21:9. I do like a bit more vertical space than a 27" 16:9 too. I've used a 28" 16:10 before that was really good (size, at least, but only 1920 x 1200).
I think my next monitor would be a 4K 40" and I would sit a littler further back from it. That's my plan anyway, if anyone makes a good one under £400 max.

Re: Which monitor should I get?

Postby metalface » March 25th, 2018, 5:11 am


metalface
 
Posts: 1
Joined: March 25th, 2018, 5:08 am
Go for 28" UE590 UHD Monitor, I got it and it works great. The colors are sharp and the design is also slim. With 4k+ ultra HD features. The image cleanup, system design and the color is great.

Re: Which monitor should I get?

Postby MK19 » March 25th, 2018, 9:37 am


MK19
step three
step three
 
Posts: 108
Joined: August 19th, 2016, 10:13 am
I have a 28" 4k Dell monitor at work. I don't recommend it at this size. Also if you're still on Windows 7 it is broken everywhere for DPI scaling. Many plugins and hotfixes needed to get 4k at such a small size to be usable in many CAD programs. Work PCs will upgrade to Windows 10 soon and I will see if that resolves it.

Re: Which monitor should I get?

Postby sonofscrotum » April 24th, 2018, 11:56 am


sonofscrotum
step four
step four
 
Posts: 215
Joined: March 11th, 2015, 2:48 pm
Location: Hiking the Appalachian Trail
My jaw dropped to the floor when I saw LG's 43-inch monitor. It's a true 4K monitor, not a TV, and it was on sale for less than $500.

Image
Last edited by sonofscrotum on April 25th, 2018, 1:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Which monitor should I get?

Postby amunta » Yesterday, 11:23 am


amunta
step one
step one
 
Posts: 24
Joined: August 1st, 2016, 4:23 pm
sonofscrotum wrote:My jaw dropped to the floor when I saw LG's 43-inch monitor. It's a true 4K monitor, not a TV, and it was on sale for less than $500.

Image


*clicks link, sees price* https://media.giphy.com/media/4pMX5rJ4PYAEM/giphy.gif


sonofscrotum
step four
step four
 
Posts: 215
Joined: March 11th, 2015, 2:48 pm
Location: Hiking the Appalachian Trail
amunta wrote:
sonofscrotum wrote:My jaw dropped to the floor when I saw LG's 43-inch monitor. It's a true 4K monitor, not a TV, and it was on sale for less than $500.

Image


*clicks link, sees price* https://media.giphy.com/media/4pMX5rJ4PYAEM/giphy.gif

Fixed it, I had the wrong product link. Somehow the specs are similar but the price is four times higher.


sonofscrotum
step four
step four
 
Posts: 215
Joined: March 11th, 2015, 2:48 pm
Location: Hiking the Appalachian Trail
Philips just announced another 43-incher.

http://media.maxborgesagency.com/press/ ... ification/

Image

User avatar

Cyberdemon
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 11:51 pm
Location: New York
I have to say I sort of struggle with anything past 40" unless you are using it at a much greater distance. I originally bought a 30" Dell Ultrasharp but wound up downsizing it to the 27" because I found myself moving my neck too much just to see things.

I can see it being useful if you need 4X inputs from multiple machines, or put the monitor much further away. But if you sit arms distance from your screen it just seems like a lot of panning and off axis viewing. The 34" is nice because it's the exact same height as the 27" just wider.


Return to software and technology