Close

Dumb Starbucks

Postby nxakt » February 10th, 2014, 7:10 pm

User avatar

nxakt
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 1031
Joined: March 15th, 2010, 5:11 am
Location: Central Shanghai

Re: Dumb Starbucks

Postby NURB » February 10th, 2014, 11:37 pm

User avatar

NURB
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: November 10th, 2005, 1:31 pm
Location: MPLS
I honestly can't believe they did it. I can't believe they got a sign shop to go along with it, and got the city/landlord to approve it. Amazing.
Chris Haar

twitter:@chrishaar

Those who define design as knowing how to use Illustrator will be condemned to using Illustrator their entire career. - @monteiro

Re: Dumb Starbucks

Postby scrotum » February 11th, 2014, 2:33 pm

User avatar

scrotum
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 616
Joined: July 23rd, 2010, 4:09 pm
Location: Hiking the Appalachian Trail
It was not a real store, it was considered an "art exhibit" parodying Starbucks; coffee was handed out for free otherwise it would've violated trademarks. The empty coffee cups are now posted on Ebay.

Re: Dumb Starbucks

Postby nxakt » February 11th, 2014, 7:18 pm

User avatar

nxakt
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 1031
Joined: March 15th, 2010, 5:11 am
Location: Central Shanghai
Turns out to be not that interesting of a meme.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-m ... z2sxr9QuPO

Re: Dumb Starbucks

Postby norasaurus » February 12th, 2014, 11:23 am


norasaurus
step one
step one
 
Posts: 21
Joined: April 12th, 2011, 4:42 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
I like this little bit from the article about people who tried to cut in line..

"As word of the shop spread on social media throughout the weekend, curious customers came to snap photos in front of the sign or pictures of the line of people wrapped around the small strip mall. Those who tried to cut to avoid a several-hour wait were promptly shamed out of line."

Re: Dumb Starbucks

Postby RaraBlackSheep » February 12th, 2014, 7:31 pm

User avatar

RaraBlackSheep
step one
step one
 
Posts: 43
Joined: October 8th, 2013, 11:06 am
Location: Left Coast
Is "dumb Stabucks" a reference I am missing or were they just incredibly unclever with the name?

Re: Dumb Starbucks

Postby sanjy009 » February 13th, 2014, 1:16 am

User avatar

sanjy009
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 867
Joined: September 16th, 2009, 6:39 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia


"This is a real business I plan to get rich from"

Re: Dumb Starbucks

Postby nxakt » February 13th, 2014, 2:12 am

User avatar

nxakt
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 1031
Joined: March 15th, 2010, 5:11 am
Location: Central Shanghai
"Minimum requirements under US law to be considered a parody"

If that is true, I just got a bunch of ideas I plan to get rich from!

My respect for the meme just went back up.

Re: Dumb Starbucks

Postby Modern Man » February 14th, 2014, 2:37 am

User avatar

Modern Man
step three
step three
 
Posts: 122
Joined: June 14th, 2013, 8:10 pm
Location: 34°03′N 118°15′W
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health is not pleased.
A man of today.

Re: Dumb Starbucks

Postby PackageID » February 14th, 2014, 11:11 am

User avatar

PackageID
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 2465
Joined: February 19th, 2006, 6:17 pm
Location: New Jersey
Total trademark violation.

J
-Justin Coble-
http://coroflot.com/jcoble

"Never let the same dog bite you twice" -Chuck Berry-

Re: Dumb Starbucks

Postby ralphzoontjens » March 1st, 2014, 9:16 pm

User avatar

ralphzoontjens
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 614
Joined: February 3rd, 2010, 10:20 am
Location: Tilburg, the Netherlands
It would be pretty bad if this is allowed, even if they don't make any money from it.
Projects like this could mess a lot with the brand perception of course. But it would not be the first time that I would be surprised by US law. Like it tolerating housebrand products that look the same standing next to the original, or TV ads where a company mentions the name of its direct competitor. Those things are just not allowed in Europe because it obviously gives competitors power to influence the perception of another brand. Not that I think this particular action would be very harmful to Starbucks, it's probably just good exposure.
http://www.designsoul.nl
Designsoul - Product Design & Visualisation


Return to branding, packaging, & retail design