Website Feedback

Postby akrober3 » October 18th, 2016, 10:28 pm

Posts: 9
Joined: February 24th, 2015, 4:28 pm
So I'm looking for some good feedback particularly on the layout of my site. What are some things is it doing well? What is hard to understand? What might the first impressions be from an employers standpoint? What is the clarity and flow like?

The reason I want layout feedback in particular is that I know my content isn't as good as it could be. I am getting my Masters in Industrial Design, but my undergraduate degree was in manufacturing engineering, thus I only have a few years of ID work under my belt, essentially everything that is on the site.

Thank you!

Re: Website Feedback

Postby yo » October 19th, 2016, 1:22 pm

User avatar

Posts: 15375
Joined: January 5th, 2004, 6:57 pm
Location: SoCal

A few structural things based on the fragments and over worked mind of a hiring manager:

1) get rid of the splash page
2) first page should be an index of your work (every additional click is a chance for abandonment, get them to your work)
3) set up the work page to get people to click projects, right now I just scroll to the bottom and am like "what else?" then go back up to click projects
4) make about you a menu item. Once I click through some work I'll then decide if it is worth the time to read about you, not the other way around.

Hope this helps! The flow is important. Make it as easy as possible for people to evaluate your work.

Re: Website Feedback

Postby KenoLeon » October 19th, 2016, 3:48 pm

User avatar

step four
step four
Posts: 568
Joined: October 23rd, 2012, 12:22 pm
Location: SoCal
Hi Addam:

- I second everything Yo said, leading with the about and placing projects somehow in the background is probably the principal thing I noticed.
- I felt I was wrestling the layout and your choice of section placement to get to your work.
- The infographics ( and leading with them on some projects I think is confusing).

If I remember correctly it is big improvement over the last iteration, so keep going.
Eugenio (Keno) Leon Linkedin Instagram

"We are surrounded with objects of desire, not objects of use.” Don Norman

Re: Website Feedback

Postby LonghornGreenback » October 21st, 2016, 4:46 am

Posts: 10
Joined: April 7th, 2015, 6:24 am
Just a few additional quibbles:

Your skill bubbles. Are you really in the best category for those things you claim? It might be a personal preference, but those sort of graphics do just irritate me. Showing you make great prototypes is worth so much more than putting 5 bubbles claiming you're good at prototyping.

I don't understand the "My Design Process" graphics. I don't understand why it is even there. Is your design process anything special? Why is it relevant? Who should read it? People looking to hire a designer probably know a bit about design. Also why is it a circle, how does the last step lead into the first?

I feel like every time you have to say "Click on the images below to view ..." is a failure in communication. The links themselves should show they are clickable and where they will take you.

Re: Website Feedback

Postby ralphzoontjens » October 31st, 2016, 5:12 am

User avatar

step four
step four
Posts: 383
Joined: February 3rd, 2010, 10:20 am
Location: Tilburg, the Netherlands
Just from a flow perspective, it would be better without the splash page and having the information immediately available when opening a new page without having to scroll down would be better. Also your resume information is repeated.

From a design point of view I like some of your explorations and product designs, but besides solving problems I would like to learn about your own way of thinking, what kind of innovations are you targeting and why, to think a bit broader and develop a wider story and communicating that through your website.

Re: Website Feedback

Postby cwatkinson » October 31st, 2016, 11:13 am

step three
step three
Posts: 170
Joined: October 8th, 2015, 11:43 am
Ill second the skills bubble....... one needs to control expectations

I see you are a 5 out of 5 for Solid works. What is this criteria based on?

I remember have some of my students from the the Advance alias surface class i taught put on their resumes that they were experts at Alias...... my challenge to them was if they felt they where on par or better then me at the software and when they answered no i challenged that if i don't consider myself an expert how do you.

Return to portfolios