Close

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby rkuchinsky » November 6th, 2009, 11:41 am

User avatar

rkuchinsky
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5764
Joined: July 3rd, 2005, 9:20 am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Highfrontier wrote:for sure, titles help focus. Unfortunately, that's now more bad focus than good focus.. when a title has reached a stage where it makes people wince when they hear it, their focus is more often on avoiding or even worse, attacking the principles.

'sustainable' seems better all round for the time being (although, it has connotations of stagnation).. let's just forget 'green', I don't think I've used it in any professional context since about 1997 anyway.



I think everyone knows what green is, so let's just keep it at that. the title of this thread also includes the term, and would likely be one of the first things someone searched for if they were interested in the topic. as vague as it is, it needs no further definition.

R
The Directive Collective
http://www.directivecollective.com

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby mrtwills » November 9th, 2009, 4:05 pm

User avatar

mrtwills
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 725
Joined: August 30th, 2007, 7:06 pm
Location: Chicago
darrenalex wrote:I am alex. My point of view, I think that green is not working in professional market(corporates). It is good for personal or some specific groups or company. I do not think that green color is that much good. Most of the organizations are going for the professional colors.



Did everyone just skip over this comment?

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby NURB » November 9th, 2009, 4:18 pm

User avatar

NURB
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4655
Joined: November 10th, 2005, 1:31 pm
Location: MPLS
Good eyes mrtwills... I completely missed that. I still stand by my mafia run UL comment though.
Chris Haar

twitter:@chrishaar

Those who define design as knowing how to use Illustrator will be condemned to using Illustrator their entire career. - @monteiro

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby mgnt8 » November 11th, 2009, 9:19 am


mgnt8
step four
step four
 
Posts: 337
Joined: June 21st, 2008, 1:12 pm

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby mrtwills » November 11th, 2009, 11:29 pm

User avatar

mrtwills
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 725
Joined: August 30th, 2007, 7:06 pm
Location: Chicago
In 1970, Kermit the Frog sang "It's not easy being Green" and here were are about to enter 2010 and feel the same way.

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby dbpuyo » December 6th, 2009, 12:06 am

User avatar

dbpuyo
step one
step one
 
Posts: 21
Joined: July 29th, 2008, 10:53 am
Location: Shanghai , China
good point.
I've been thinking something similar for a long time. "Green Design" seems to turn out more of a FAD. Only minor production/design seem to have good results with efficient process and the majority just using "green" as a selling point.

When they had the "green house design" at the Chicago Sci & Tech museum last year.. I was actually depressed.

I mean.. "The dining table was made from a tree that was struck by a lightning and the designer has re used it, so its green!"
Come on..

But I do like how it has become a larger factor to consider.

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby thirdnorth » December 6th, 2009, 2:25 am


thirdnorth
step three
step three
 
Posts: 100
Joined: January 13th, 2009, 4:22 pm
Highfrontier wrote:'sustainable' seems better all round for the time being (although, it has connotations of stagnation).. let's just forget 'green', I don't think I've used it in any professional context since about 1997 anyway.


Here's an interesting article from Frank Ferudi about the fluidity of human life and how it conflicts with the current drive for sustainability. It also explores how sustainability has taken on an almost religious tone.

It's obvious too. Those companies who've converted to environmentalism flaunt their "holier-than-thou" and "holier-than-that-other-company" mantra in your face as they embark on their new marketing mission, printing up new catalogs made of recycled paper and soy inks telling the world of their conversion, asking you to buy their product, and at the same time chastising you for your over-consumption of resources.

I agree with others on this topic, that it's an obvious choice for companies to be as efficient as possible, cutting down on materials while designing for durability increases profits. It's a no-brainer. But screaming it from the rooftops increases noise pollution.

The article takes a less critical stance than the one I take.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/ ... icle/7782/
Design without purpose is impossible.

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby Highfrontier » December 7th, 2009, 7:21 am


Highfrontier
step two
step two
 
Posts: 72
Joined: August 18th, 2007, 4:58 pm
interesting point he makes there - sustainability acts as a suppressant/depressant to the human desire to fly higher and higher with language that's about moderation, cutting back, etc..

Sustainability is about addressing the basics of survival, but it's only a part of the picture and not something to be exclusively obsessed with.
I think the gloom surrounding this is all our failures in not having the imagination to be able to balance the talk of sustainability with challenges for the future. What's not to be excited and invigorated about ! There's a Universe of possibilities and places to explore out there.. we're strong, adaptable and have imagination and we'll get better and better if we take care of the planet that provides for us in our infancy.

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby Brenden Macaluso » February 9th, 2010, 3:02 am


Brenden Macaluso
 
Posts: 2
Joined: February 9th, 2010, 2:00 am
I have felt that the term "Green" has become an abused one. In my definition, when marketers and therefore the general public it refers to something being Green it is an intention of postitive action twoards the environmet and or planet. While these intentions are good they can be easily misguided, distorted or have little to no impact. Thus, Green has become a catch all word for almost anything with an environmental spin...

As a design professional I also prefer the term Sustainable over Green. In fact I prefer to even interchange the word Sustainable with Maintainable, because essentially that is what we are doing with our efforts and resources.

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby Sydneysider » April 5th, 2017, 7:41 am


Sydneysider
 
Posts: 3
Joined: April 5th, 2017, 7:22 am
A few years on since this thread was started, a new president in the USA who is of the opinion that global warming is not man made, lessons not learned... so what progress was made in direction to greener designs? Here in Australia we continue with business as usual, the next generation can shoulder the burden.
I am trained in Europe as architect, here in Australia we have started 8 years ago an online business (www.thedesigngiftshop.com) offering 'good design', simple, near minimalist -if possible.
We as our own little contribution to becoming green and greener keep trying to sell in our shop sustainable products, products that last, eco friendly etc..., but what really sells is what is cheap. Nothing new, but also nothing changes.
I'd love to hear your opinion if we are the way to a 'greener' more sustainable future (in the near futur) or not???

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby ralphzoontjens » April 7th, 2017, 2:56 am

User avatar

ralphzoontjens
step four
step four
 
Posts: 570
Joined: February 3rd, 2010, 10:20 am
Location: Tilburg, the Netherlands
Still a very relevant discussion isn't it. It is often overrated how well products advertised as green or fairtrade do on the market. Yet we are part of a sustainable system ourselves and we like recycling and sustainable energy. If we look at the numbers then yes, we do have an effect on the climate, but not in catastrophic ways. The planet is self-stabilizing and will survive. It is warming up now but not too far in the future will cool down again for a new ice age. Also the ozone layer is healing now we stopped using harmful chemicals. So I think innovation will be very much ground up, bioplastics and biodegradable additives becoming more and more cost-effective and common. They will not be the major selling points of a product, it is just the industry slowly evolving. We are now at the time where we are seriously considering how to innovate sustainably and with the shutdown of coal power plants, the transition to more sustainable energy production by water and thorium reactors as well as Tesla's Gigafactory plans, get us a long way.
http://www.designsoul.nl
Designsoul - Product Design & Visualisation

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby iab » April 7th, 2017, 7:20 am


iab
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 2446
Joined: January 5th, 2004, 6:03 pm
ralphzoontjens wrote: bioplastics and biodegradable additives


I have a question about this. Why is this a good thing?

The issue is carbon. We extract it from the ground in the form of oil, we burn it, it releases to the atmosphere as CO2.

But if we take the oil and convert it to plastic, we have very effectively sequestered the carbon and it will essentially never be released into the atmosphere as CO2. As soon as you make the plastic biodegradable, the carbon will be released.

Seems to me, putting the carbon back into the earth is more responsible after we take it out of the earth.

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby IDAL » April 7th, 2017, 9:01 pm

User avatar

IDAL
step four
step four
 
Posts: 293
Joined: December 7th, 2012, 2:03 pm
Location: Shanghai
iab wrote:
ralphzoontjens wrote: bioplastics and biodegradable additives


I have a question about this. Why is this a good thing?

The issue is carbon. We extract it from the ground in the form of oil, we burn it, it releases to the atmosphere as CO2.

But if we take the oil and convert it to plastic, we have very effectively sequestered the carbon and it will essentially never be released into the atmosphere as CO2. As soon as you make the plastic biodegradable, the carbon will be released.

Seems to me, putting the carbon back into the earth is more responsible after we take it out of the earth.


CO2 is just one of them, you have a bunch of other gases responsible for climate change like Methane that are way worse than CO2.
I'm surprised this is still on the EPA website https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases

However, plastic are affecting wildlife and, indirectly, also affecting climate. Plastics floating on the ocean are incorporated into the food chain. They also block light and affecting plankton and the other animals they subsequently feed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_garbage_patch

http://www.environment.gov.au/marine/publications/impacts-plastic-debris-australian-marine-wildlife

Everything we can do to overturn this is welcome. Personally I think both are necessary, taking care of the ocean and of the atmosphere are equally important.
Alejandro Lara
____________

Observe
Explore
Create

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby iab » April 10th, 2017, 8:12 am


iab
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 2446
Joined: January 5th, 2004, 6:03 pm
IDAL wrote:
CO2 is just one of them, you have a bunch of other gases responsible for climate change like Methane that are way worse than CO2.


I understand. And as a matter of fact, not only does the biodegrading process create CO2, it creates methane too. Composting biodegradable materials hastens release to the atmosphere. Sequestering plastic in a landfill solves both problems.

IDAL wrote:
However, plastic are affecting wildlife and, indirectly, also affecting climate.


While I agree, what I don't know what is worse, having a low percentage of plastic waste directly in the environment, or biodegradables contributing to greenhouse gas build up.

Re: "Green design is just a fashion"

Postby yo » April 10th, 2017, 8:04 pm

User avatar

yo
Administration
Administration
 
Posts: 16017
Joined: January 5th, 2004, 6:57 pm
Location: SoCal
Basically, humans suck for the environment.

Previous | Go to the Next Page

Return to designer's accord and green design