Close
User avatar

Skinny Pete
step one
step one
 
Posts: 28
Joined: July 27th, 2005, 2:10 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Just curious.

Postby eco.iD » June 11th, 2008, 3:55 pm

User avatar

eco.iD
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 616
Joined: August 25th, 2005, 11:15 am
Lately I've been considering it permanently, at least due to the field I'm in. There are too many needless objects out there on the market. Everyone is in the market to make a quick buck by blowing through the research and development, design, and testing phases. I don't understand why we can't design products for consumers that will be an ongoing trend and last at the same time. Pretty sad

Postby MonoNoAware » April 9th, 2009, 8:11 pm

User avatar

MonoNoAware
step two
step two
 
Posts: 96
Joined: March 25th, 2009, 12:48 pm
eco.iD wrote:Lately I've been considering it permanently, at least due to the field I'm in. There are too many needless objects out there on the market. Everyone is in the market to make a quick buck by blowing through the research and development, design, and testing phases. I don't understand why we can't design products for consumers that will be an ongoing trend and last at the same time. Pretty sad



Word!
"If you put smart technology into a pointless product, the result will be a stupid product."

John Thackara

Postby Cameron » April 10th, 2009, 12:24 am

User avatar

Cameron
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 1079
Joined: January 26th, 2008, 12:44 am
Location: San Diego
I do want to make things. I want to make things that are thoughtful, meet a valid need, last as long as appropriately possible, and beautify the world.

There is a lot of needless junk in the world, but if designers give up the fight, I think we'll just see more needless junk than before. Design may contribute to the proliferation of stuff, but it also contributes to the continued use of and our emotional attachment to stuff.

I think the endless thirst for stuff is more a societal symptom than it is a cause created in part by designers. Design, like everything else, is a tool that can be used for good and for bad.
Cameron Nielsen
Personal Site / Coroflot / LinkedIn
"there is an inherent intelligence to beauty" - Dori Tunstall

Postby nunoCR » May 4th, 2009, 10:35 am

User avatar

nunoCR
step two
step two
 
Posts: 61
Joined: April 6th, 2009, 1:28 pm
eco.iD wrote:I don't understand why we can't design products for consumers that will be an ongoing trend and last at the same time. Pretty sad


pretty simple!
taken out from here http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/joo ... &Itemid=58
i highly recommend it
1) If a company was to use the best known design and the best known materials, they would likely have a much higher production cost and would likely lose a competitive edge.
2) If products were made to last for extended periods of time, people would not need to repeatedly replace, update and fix their items as much, and a vast amount of revenue and jobs would be lost by industry at large, slowing the economy.

This is, of course, unsustainable by definition, for the inherent inefficiency of the economic system eventually creates unnecessary multiplicities, waste and pollution.

Postby design-engine » June 15th, 2009, 8:19 pm

User avatar

design-engine
full self-realization
full self-realization
 
Posts: 702
Joined: December 14th, 2004, 4:27 pm
Location: United States of America
The fundamental problem with consumerism is that the trends strike designs obsolete quickly.
Bart Brejcha
DESIGN-ENGINE|EDUCATION

http://design-engine.com/category/courses/ SolidWorks surfacing classes

User avatar

nunoCR
step two
step two
 
Posts: 61
Joined: April 6th, 2009, 1:28 pm
Trends are basically planned mechanisms to promote obsolescence in order to keep the cyclical consumption going, otherwise, if consumption was to stop or slow down the whole system would get hit badlly.
The Zeitgeist Movement
the best things in life are not things.


Return to designer's accord and green design